Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...

Supporting Data: Influence of particle lithology, size, and angularity on rates and products of bedload wear: an experimental study


Authors:
Owners: This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) to determine if accessing this resource is possible.
Type: Resource
Storage: The size of this resource is 86.5 MB
Created: Sep 20, 2024 at 6:52 p.m. (UTC)
Last updated: Sep 21, 2024 at 5:01 p.m. (UTC)
Citation: See how to cite this resource
Content types: Geographic Raster Content 
Sharing Status: Private (Accessible via direct link sharing)
Views: 158
Downloads: 28
+1 Votes: Be the first one to 
 this.
Comments: No comments (yet)

Abstract

This data is intended as Supplemental Materials for the manuscript titled "Influence of particle lithology, size, and angularity on rates and products of bedload wear: an experimental study" (2024, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms).
Physical wear during bedload transport influences downstream changes in the size distributions and shapes of riverbed sediment, which in turn affect myriad fluvial processes ranging from incision into bedrock to provision of aquatic habitat. Here we use laboratory tumbling experiments to address several remaining knowledge gaps, including the roles of lithologic susceptibility to fragmentation, particle size distributions, and particle angularity in controlling wear rates and the size distribution of wear products. To focus on the dynamics of particle wear in headwater channels, we used initially angular sediment and ran the experiments until 10% of the initial bedload particle mass had been lost to fine-grained wear products. We measured individual particle mass and diameter by hand and used photo analysis to quantify particle shape and angularity. We find strikingly different wear patterns between limestone and welded tuff. Although wear rates in the tuff were an order of magnitude slower than the limestone, tuff wear was primarily by fragmentation while limestone wear was dominantly by attrition. Fragmentation of the tuff resulted in a widening of the bedload size distribution, a lack of consistent particle rounding, and fine-wear product dominated by sand. In contrast, limestone particles rounded substantially, and produced silt-sized wear products. Differences in wear product size and susceptibility to fragmentation may reflect contrasts in the size distribution of mineral crystals in each lithology. Wear rates in both rock types declined substantially with increasing cumulative mass loss, due to rounding in the limestone and reduced fragmentation in the tuff. These results suggest that applications of the conventional exponential model to predict mass loss with travel distance need to account for lithologic influence on susceptibility to fragmentation and the influence of rounding on particle wear rates.

This data is intended as Supplemental Materials for the manuscript in Earth Surface Processes and Landforms.

Subject Keywords

Coverage

Spatial

Coordinate System/Geographic Projection:
WGS 84 EPSG:4326
Coordinate Units:
Decimal degrees
Place/Area Name:
American River Watershed & Owens River Gorge, California
North Latitude
39.3014°
East Longitude
-118.0371°
South Latitude
36.8280°
West Longitude
-120.9155°

Content

Credits

Contributors

People or Organizations that contributed technically, materially, financially, or provided general support for the creation of the resource's content but are not considered authors.

Name Organization Address Phone Author Identifiers
Matthew Cardona San Francisco State University
Sarah Pettyjohn San Francisco State University

How to Cite

Bray, E., L. Sklar, K. Litwin-Miller (2024). Supporting Data: Influence of particle lithology, size, and angularity on rates and products of bedload wear: an experimental study, HydroShare, http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/90f6e1de9e9048a69085ef6b3fc47813

This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CC-BY

Comments

There are currently no comments

New Comment

required