Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
| Authors: |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
| Type: | Resource | |
| Storage: | The size of this resource is 1.8 KB | |
| Created: | Feb 08, 2023 at 3:18 a.m. | |
| Last updated: | Feb 08, 2023 at 3:19 a.m. | |
| Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
| Sharing Status: | Public |
|---|---|
| Views: | 278 |
| Downloads: | 199 |
| +1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
| Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
Thr Amsterdam Water Supply has been using both the finite difference model MODFLOW (McDonald, M.G., Harbaugh, A.W., 1989. A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground water flow model. Chapter Al, USGS, Book 6, Modeling Techniques) and the analytic element model MLAEM (Strack, O.D.L,, 1989. Groundwater Mechanics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, (ISBN 0-13-365412-5); Strack, O.D.L,, 1999. Principles of the analytic element method. Journal of Hydrology, 226, 128-138) for many years. Choosing one or the other depends on the hydrologic system, its scale and the hydrologic features to be taken into account. Either method has its specific advantages. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Content
Additional Metadata
| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| DOI | 10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00181-X |
| Depth | 20 |
| Scale | 101 - 1 000 km² |
| Layers | 1 layer |
| Purpose | Groundwater resources |
| GroMoPo_ID | 160 |
| IsVerified | True |
| Model Code | MODFLOW |
| Model Link | https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00181-X |
| Model Time | SS |
| Model Year | 1999 |
| Model Authors | T. N. Oslthoorn |
| Model Country | Netherlands |
| Data Available | Report/paper only |
| Developer Email | NA |
| Dominant Geology | Unconsolidated sediments |
| Developer Country | Netherlands |
| Publication Title | A comparative review of analytic and finite difference models used at the Amsterdam Water Supply |
| Original Developer | No |
| Additional Information | The Amsterdam Water Supply has been using both the finite difference model MODFLOW and the analytic element model MLAEM for many years. Choosing one or the other depends on the hydrologic system, its scale and the hydrologic features to be taken into account. Either method has its specific advantages. |
| Integration or Coupling | Water management |
| Evaluation or Calibration | Static water levels |
| Geologic Data Availability |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment