Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
| Authors: |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
| Type: | Resource | |
| Storage: | The size of this resource is 174 bytes | |
| Created: | Feb 08, 2023 at 1:56 p.m. | |
| Last updated: | Feb 08, 2023 at 1:56 p.m. | |
| Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
| Sharing Status: | Public |
|---|---|
| Views: | 448 |
| Downloads: | 187 |
| +1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
| Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
Remotely-sensed elevation data are potentially useful for constructing regional scale groundwater models, particularly in regions where ground-based data are poor or sparse. Surface-water elevations measured by the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) were used to develop a regional-groundwater flow model by assuming that frozen surface waters reflect local hydraulic head (or groundwater potential). Drainage lakes (fed primarily by surface water) are designated as boundary conditions and seepage lakes and isolated wetlands (fed primarily by groundwater) are used as observation points to calibrate a numerical flow model of the 900 km(2) study area in the Northern Highland Lakes Region of Wisconsin, USA. Elevation data were utilized in a geographic information system (GIS) based groundwater-modeling package that employs the analytic element method (AEM). Calibration statistics indicate that lakes and wetlands had similar influence on the parameter estimation, suggesting that wetlands might be used as observations where open water elevations are unreliable or not available. Open water elevations are often difficult to resolve in radar interferometry because unfrozen water does not return off-nadir radar signals.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Content
Additional Metadata
| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10040-006-0115-3 |
| Depth | 77 |
| Scale | 101 - 1 000 km² |
| Layers | 1 |
| Purpose | Groundwater resources;Scientific investigation (not related to applied problem) |
| GroMoPo_ID | 247 |
| IsVerified | True |
| Model Code | ArcAEM |
| Model Link | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-006-0115-3 |
| Model Time | SS |
| Model Year | 2007 |
| Model Authors | Fredrick, KC; Becker, MW; Matott, LS; Daw, A; Bandilla, K; Flewelling, DM |
| Model Country | United States |
| Data Available | Report/paper only |
| Developer Email | kcf2@buffalo.edu |
| Dominant Geology | Unconsolidated sediments |
| Developer Country | USA |
| Publication Title | Development of a numerical groundwater flow model using SRTM elevations |
| Original Developer | No |
| Additional Information | Developing a groundwater model based on remote sensing data and using seepage lakes and wetlands to calibrate for water levels |
| Integration or Coupling | Surface water |
| Evaluation or Calibration | Static water levels;Dynamic water levels |
| Geologic Data Availability | No |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment