Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...

This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.

Final Report: Armstrong 2013 Exploratory Interviews of Water Managers

Authors:
Owners:		This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource.
Type:	Resource
Storage:	The size of this resource is 54.5 KB
Created:	Jul 15, 2016 at 8:34 p.m.
Last updated:	Dec 30, 2016 at 10:54 p.m.
Citation:	See how to cite this resource

Sharing Status:	Public
Views:	1755
Downloads:	45
+1 Votes:	Be the first one to this.
Comments:	No comments (yet)

Abstract

This report summarizes results from my first year’s iUTAH fellowship (2012-13), which involved exploratory, qualitative research on local water management in the Wasatch Regional Metropolitan Area, specifically focusing on Cache Valley, Heber Valley, and the Red Butte Watershed of Salt Lake City, Utah. Data collection consisted of two types of activities: meeting observations and semi-structured interviews. I reviewed meeting notes and synthetic notes for prevailing themes, and distinguished between patterns that emerged both within and across the three study areas.

The structure of water management in the WRMA crosses macro-institutional, meso-watershed, and micro-individual scales. The focus of my research has been at the meso-scale, within which many local water management organizations (LWMOs) make critical decisions surrounding water quality and quantity. In this first phase of my work, I identify five types of key organization decisions made by LWMOs: operational, maintenance, water supply, infrastructure change, and enforcement. I then describe four types of linkages among WRMA water actors and provide examples of how these linkages impact LWMOs’ decisions. I then describe and analyze the ways in which LWMOs are making adaptive decisions in the face of key changes in urbanization and water availability. Two common adaptive processes are: (a) improving infrastructure efficiency, and (b) engaging in organizational partnerships. The report concludes with directions for future research. The LWMO interview instrument is included in the appendix.

Subject Keywords

Deleting all keywords will set the resource sharing status to private.

Coverage

Spatial

Coordinate System/Geographic Projection:

WGS 84 EPSG:4326

Coordinate Units:

Decimal degrees

North Latitude

42.0085°

East Longitude

-111.1432°

South Latitude

40.0697°

West Longitude

-112.3517°

Temporal

Start Date:
End Date:

Content

Learn more about the BagIt download

Select a file to see file type metadata.

Credits

Funding Agencies

This resource was created using funding from the following sources:

Agency Name	Award Title	Award Number
National Science Foundation	iUTAH-innovative Urban Transitions and Aridregion Hydro-sustainability	1208732

Contributors

People or Organizations that contributed technically, materially, financially, or provided general support for the creation of the resource's content but are not considered authors.

Name	Organization	Address	Phone	Author Identifiers
Douglas Jackson-Smith

How to Cite

Armstrong, A. (2016). Final Report: Armstrong 2013 Exploratory Interviews of Water Managers, HydroShare, http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/2bbd6345e2e44f7bb3ccfb7a156482c4

This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Comments

There are currently no comments