In downloading this resource contents you are ethically bound to respect the terms of this license.
Please confirm that you accept the terms of this license below before you can do any downloads for this resource.
Resource License Agreement
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
In downloading this resource contents you are ethically bound to respect the terms of this license.
Please confirm that you accept the terms of this license below before you can do any downloads for this resource.
Copy resource bag to your iRODS user zone
Are you sure you want to copy this resource bag to your iRODS user zone?
Please wait for the process to complete.
Redirecting to the referenced web URL
The content you have requested to access is not stored in HydroShare, and we can’t guarantee its availability,
quality, security, or size. If the externally linked content is large, access may take time.
This dataset uses Census Data following published social vulnerability index literature to provide an index at the Place level.
The Corps of Engineers has chosen SoVI as the “foundational SVA (Social Vulnerability Analysis) method for characterizing social vulnerability….” (Dunning and Durden 2013) The University of South Carolina has provided extensive and historic data for this methodology. Susan Cutter and her team have published their methodology and continue to maintain their database. Thus it was chosen as the “primary tool for [Army] Corps SVA applications.” (ibid) The downside is that this method is complex and hard to communicate and understand at times. (S. Cutter, Boruff, and Shirley 2003) The Social Vulnerability Index (SoVI) for this study was constructed at the U.S. Census Place level for the state of Utah. We utilized the conventions put forth by Cutter (2011) as closely as possible using the five-year American Community Survey (ACS) data from 2008 to 2012. The ACS collects a different, more expansive set of variables than the Census Long Form utilized in Cutter et al. (2003), which required some deviation in variable selection from the original method. However, Holand and Lujala (2013) demonstrated that the SoVI could be constructed using regional contextually appropriate variables rather than the specific variables presented by Cutter et al. (2003). Where possible, variables were selected which matched with the Cutter et al. (2003) work. The Principle Components Analysis was conducted using the statistical software R version 3.2.3 (R 2015) and the prcomp function. Using the Cutter (2011) conventions for component selection, we chose to use the first ten principle components which explained 76% of the variance in the data. Once the components were selected, we assessed the correlation coefficients for each component and determined the tendency (how it increases or decreases) of each component for calculating the final index values. With the component tendencies assessed, we created an arithmetic function to calculate the final index scores in ESRI’s ArcGIS software (ESRI 2014). The scores were then classified using an equal interval classification in ArcGIS to produce five classes of vulnerability, ranging from very low to very high. The SoVI constructed for our study is largely consistent with previous indices published by Susan Cutter at a macro scale, which were used as a crude validation for the analysis. The pattern of vulnerability in the state is clustered, with the lowest vulnerability in the most densely populated area of the state, centered on Salt Lake City (see Figure [UT_SoVI.png]). Most of the state falls in the moderate vulnerability class, which is to be expected.
Deleting all keywords will set the resource sharing status to private.
Resource Level Coverage
Spatial
Coordinate System/Geographic Projection:
WGS 84 EPSG:4326
Coordinate Units:
Decimal degrees
Place/Area Name:
Utah Census Places
North Latitude
42.0003°
East Longitude
-109.0063°
South Latitude
37.0201°
West Longitude
-114.1479°
Temporal
Start Date:
End Date:
Open
Preview
Download
Download zipped
Get file URL
Open referenced URL
Refresh
Select all
Content
This resource contains links to external content. Linked content is
NOT stored in HydroShare, and we can't guarantee its availability, quality, or
security.
Confirm files deletion
Consider downloading a copy of file(s) before deleting.
Various Census variables to calculate the Social Vulnerability Index
Data Collection Method
Utilized select variables from ACS 2008-2012 datasets. Also includes County level SoVI from University of South Carolina for reference. USC under Susan L. Cutter is the premier authority on social vulnerability indexes in the United States.
Data Processing Method
Followed Cutter's methodology for calculating SoVI at the place level.
Credits
Funding Agencies
This resource was created using funding from the following sources:
iUTAH-innovative Urban Transitions and Aridregion Hydro-sustainability
1208732
Contributors
People or Organizations that contributed technically, materially, financially, or provided general support for the
creation of the resource's content but are not considered authors.
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment