Hi, I'm an error. x

Community Key Informant Final

Authors: Melissa Haeffner · Courtney G Flint · Douglas Jackson-Smith
Owners: Melissa Haeffner
DOI:10.4211/hs.5189f406a23946c2953865f74e520db9 How to Cite
Resource type:Composite Resource
Created:Aug 01, 2017 at 4:39 p.m.
Last updated: Nov 02, 2017 at midnight by Melissa Haeffner


Forty-two water decision makers in cities in Utah were identified representing elected official positions as well as staff (e.g., public utilities, public works, etc.). Three valleys in the rapidly growing Northern Utah Wasatch Range Metropolitan Area (WRMA) are represented. In smaller cities where staff play multiple roles, those who performed some operations in water management were selected. Those selected for interviews were identified through city websites and, in a few cases, phone calls to city hall. Participants were contacted by email first and followed up telephone as needed.

All of the interviews were conducted in-person between November 2015 and July 2016. During this time, city elections complicated contact and identifying key informants. When able, we interviewed the incumbents. Only one potential respondent who had initially agreed to an interview canceled without follow-up, for a response rate of 97.6%. Interviews were audio-recorded and tended to last between 20 and 90 minutes each. Each interview was transcribed with the help of two transcribers and deductively coded for themes by a team of three using NVIVO 11 Pro. The team started with an a priori coding matrix based on the interview guide and allowed for additional themes to emerge through the revision of categories and the coding agenda, reaching inter-coder reliability (<80% kappa coefficient). The database in NVIVO titled CKI_project_TEAM contains 40 transcribed interviews. One interview was not coded due to irrelevance and the pilot interview was not coded. Interview 013 does not exist because the respondent canceled. Overall, coders maintained a range of kappa coefficients with % minimum agreement. The final agreement measurements were calculated on Interview 38 which was coded by all three coders. High dual-coder agreement was also attained on the following interviews: 001, 003, 004, and 011. Coders met weekly to retain alignment in nodes and definitions (qualitative agreement). Coders were instructed to code every respondent sentence to the period (quantitative agreement). If the respondent's answer was short (e.g., Yes/No), the coder coded the interview question along with the answer to retain context. Respondents were asked the following: 1) the one key water issue facing their city today; 2) if their city had an adequate water supply to meet their city’s needs today, and 3) did they think their city had an adequate water supply to meet their city’s needs in the future.

Subject Keywords

water,urban,Utah,public utilities

How to cite

Haeffner, M., C. G. Flint, D. Jackson-Smith (2017). Community Key Informant Final, HydroShare, https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.5189f406a23946c2953865f74e520db9

This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.


  • Downloads require agreement to resource rights statement

  • Sharing status:

    • Published Resource  Published


    Download All Content as Zipped BagIt Archive
    Learn more about the Bagit archive format


    The people or organizations that created the intellectual content of the resource.

    Name Organization Address Phone Author Identifiers
    Melissa Haeffner Utah State University - Logan, UT 7734943726
    Courtney G Flint Utah State University
    Douglas Jackson-Smith The Ohio State University Ohio, US 330-202-3540


    People or organizations that contributed technically, materially, financially, or provided general support for the creation of the resource's content but are not considered authors.

    Name Organization Address Phone Author Identifiers
    Natalie Harker Kenley freelance transcriber
    Ennea Fairchild Department of Sociology
    Matt Barnett Ohio State University


    This resource was created using funding from the following sources:
    Agency Name Award Title Award Number
    NSF Epscor part of the State of Utah EPSCoR Research Infrastructure Improvement Award IIA 1208732


    Be the first one to  +1 this.  (You need to be logged in to rate this.)


    There are currently no comments

    New Comment