Checking for missing content type metadata ...

Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...

Lake Mead Water Conservation Program Analysis


Authors:
Owners: This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource.
Type: Resource
Storage: The size of this resource is 60.0 MB
Created: Aug 08, 2026 at 6:45 a.m. (UTC)
Last updated: Aug 08, 2026 at 7:29 a.m. (UTC)
Citation: See how to cite this resource
Content types: CSV Content 
Sharing Status: Public
Views: 50
Downloads: 0
+1 Votes: Be the first one to 
 this.
Comments: No comments (yet)

Abstract

Since 2007, California, Arizona, Nevada, and Mexico have voluntarily reduced their legally entitled Colorado River water use by 4.4 million acre-feet, with 3.6 million acre-feet of conserved water presently remaining in Lake Mead. These efforts kept Lake Mead storage above critical elevations through the recent 20-year (and ongoing) dry period. The voluntary water conservation program operates on the assumption that annual physically available water (reservoir inflow minus evaporation) exceeds total legal entitlements of 9.0 million acre-feet per year. This assumption is challenged as the Colorado River Basin becomes more arid. Additionally, as reservoir storage declines towards catastrophic elevations, users face difficulty accessing and withdrawing their conserved water. We suggest two novel improvements that tie accounting of reductions to the annual physically available water, rather than historical entitlements: 1) Proportionally reduce credits for conserved water, and 2) Create a new protection account to be managed by the U.S. Bureau of USBR (USBR), with separate water accounts for each user. Through these structures, the USBR takes a first share of the physically available water that is equal to reservoir evaporation to sustain the protected volume. Then, water users divide the remaining inflow and consume, conserve, and/or trade within their account balances. Both suggestions have potential benefits to stabilize and recover Lake Mead storage while giving users more adaptability and autonomy to manage their differing and, sometimes, conflicting risks of declining flows. These strategies can serve as examples for other water systems that face aridity, declining reservoir storage, and user conflicts.

Contents:
README.md - Main readme file. Contains explanations of and directions to use the contents.
LakeMeadWaterConservationProgramSuccessChallengesSuggestions_v4.docx - Microsoft Word file with the manuscript.
Python-Fig6to7 - Python code to generate Figures 6 and 7 in the manuscript.
R-Fig1to5 - R code to generate Figures 1 to 5 in the manuscript.

Subject Keywords

Coverage

Spatial

Coordinate System/Geographic Projection:
WGS 84 EPSG:4326
Coordinate Units:
Decimal degrees
Place/Area Name:
Lake Mead
North Latitude
36.9979°
East Longitude
-110.8850°
South Latitude
31.5174°
West Longitude
-117.1692°

Temporal

Start Date:
End Date:

Content

README.md

The Lake Mead Water Conservation Program: Reducing Users’ Conflicting Risks of Declining Flows with more Adaptation and Autonomy.

This repository contains R and Python code to generate the figures in the paper with this title.

Explanation of Contents

  1. R-Fig1to5: R code to generate figures 1 to 5 in the paper.
  2. Python-Fig6to7: Python code to generate figures 6 and 7 in the paper.
  3. LakeMeadWaterConservationProgramSuccessChallengesSuggestions_v4.docx: Word file containing the most recent version of the manuscript.

Directions to Generate Results

Figures 1 to 5 and Tables 2 and A1:

  1. Move into the folder R-Fig1to5.
  2. Then move into the folder LakeMeadWaterConservationProgramAnalysis.
  3. Follow the instructions in the README.md file within this folder.
  4. Note: the folder AutoReadUSBRData contains functions and scripts to read reservoir and water conservation program activity data from Reclamation web sites.

Figures 6 to 7:

  1. Move into the folder Python-Fig6to7.
  2. Follow the directions in the README.md file within this folder.

Requested Citation

David E. Rosenberg, Brittany Fager, Anabelle Myers, Erik Porse (2026), “The Lake Mead Water Conservation Program: Reducing Users’ Conflicting Risks of Declining Flows with more Adaptation and Autonomy.” Utah State University. Logan, Utah. https://github.com/ImmersiveModelsColoradoRiver/LakeMeadWaterConservationProgramAnalysis.

Credits

Funding Agencies

This resource was created using funding from the following sources:
Agency Name Award Title Award Number
NOAA Cooperative Institute Program Cooperative Institute for Research to Operations in Hydrology (CIROH) NA22NWS4320003

How to Cite

Rosenberg, D. E., Myers, A. (2026). Lake Mead Water Conservation Program Analysis, HydroShare, http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/71a971cd51b64ef8a7030f25639c0a3c

This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CC-BY

Comments

There are currently no comments

New Comment

required