Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...

Great Salt Lake Playa Element Concentrations under Wet and Dry Conditions near Antelope Island, UT


Authors:
Owners: This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) to determine if accessing this resource is possible.
Type: Resource
Storage: The size of this resource is 124.1 KB
Created: Oct 23, 2023 at 6:07 p.m.
Last updated: Oct 24, 2023 at 6:09 p.m.
Citation: See how to cite this resource
Sharing Status: Discoverable (Accessible via direct link sharing)
Views: 173
Downloads: 4
+1 Votes: Be the first one to 
 this.
Comments: 1 comment

Abstract

As dust from the Great Salt Lake is blown into Salt Lake City and other major populated areas, it raises concerns about what the dust contains and the health hazards this may cause for nearby inhabitants. The study focuses on the effects that the rising and lowering of the shoreline will have on the sediment surrounding the Great Salt Lake. The repetition of these cycles affects the mobility of specific sediments and pollutants through changes in redox cycling, which can cause them to rise to the surface. The worry is that as wetting and drying occur, harmful sediment contents will make their way to the sediment’s surface, dry, and ultimately be blown into nearby cities as a harmful pollutant. To investigate this, shallow playa samples were collected seasonally for one calendar year (Sep. 2022 to Jun. 2023) along transects from the shore under varying moisture conditions at two locations near Antelope Island, UT, and analyzed for elemental concentrations.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Geological Survey under Grant/Cooperative Agreement No. G21AP10623.

DISCLAIMER:
The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Geological Survey. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey.

Subject Keywords

Coverage

Spatial

Coordinate System/Geographic Projection:
WGS 84 EPSG:4326
Coordinate Units:
Decimal degrees
Place/Area Name:
Antelope Island Bridger Bay and White Rock Bay
North Latitude
41.0643°
East Longitude
-112.2157°
South Latitude
40.9745°
West Longitude
-112.2947°

Temporal

Start Date:
End Date:

Content

Readme.txt

Sampling Procedures: 
Three to six transects were taken at each site depending on the visual differences in the sediment’s saturation levels. The first transect at each site was taken at the shoreline with the most saturated transect first and decreasing saturation as the distance from the shoreline increased. Each transect contained three undisturbed surface sediment samples, 1.5 meters apart, in a line parallel to the shore. Samples were collected using an ESS Core N One soil coring device (Environmental Sampling Supply, San Leandro CA, part #LL5035SRNG). 
Sampling dates: September 30, 2022, six transects were taken at each site. December 2, 2022, three transects were collected at site one and four collected at site two. March 27, 2023, three transects were collected at site one and, due to weather conditions and an increase of sinking sand, the shoreline of site two was inaccessible. June 26, 2023, four transects were collected at each site. 


Laboratory Analysis: 
At the lab samples were then stored in a fridge, while not in use, to keep samples stable. The samples were removed from the cores, each disposal coring devices collected approximately 5 g of intact sample and was around 40-65 cm in length. Each sample was separated into a top, middle and bottom layer due to the visual differences of the core and each section was stored in separate, labeled Ziplock bags.
Water content of each layer was determined by drying 0.5 g of sample at 105°C overnight determining the dry weight of the samples using the initial wet weight and the final dry weight. These values were used to determine the water content. 
Total elemental concentration was determined using “Hotblock digestion of Sediments, Sludges, and Soils EPA Method 3050B- Modified for Hotblock Digestion” procedure. Each sample was diluted 1:100, to avoid the high concentration of NaCl to influence the results, and tested levels of metals-ICPMS (Agilent 8900 ICPMSMS).

Data Description: 
- All data are included in the '2022-2023_GSL_AntelopeIsland_Sampling.xlsx' spreadsheet
- Sample collection date: Date samples were collected from the field
- Longitude/Latitude: Location of the transect parallel to the shore. Samples were collected in triplicates along each transect.
- % Wet weight: Determined after drying 0.5 g of sample at 105°C overnight 
- Length of Core section: Reported in milimeters (mm)
- Sample ID: Unique sample ID given for internal Analysis
- Sample Name: Site X TX a/b/c --> Site 1: Bridger Bay; Site 2: White Rock Bay. T1-TN transect numbers from 1 at the shore, and N farthest from the shore; a/b/c given to each sample replicate along each transect
- Conc. [ug/g]: Element concentrations reported on a dry mass basis as micrograms per gram
- MRL: Minimum reporting limit
- MDL: Minimum detection limit
- Color-coding:  Black numbers are quantifiable, Blue are over range (values above the highest standard), Red are below the reporting limit.

Credits

Funding Agencies

This resource was created using funding from the following sources:
Agency Name Award Title Award Number
U.S. Geological Survey Grant/Cooperative Agreement No. G21AP10623

How to Cite

Young, S., J. McLean, A. Sorenson, J. Stead, M. Li (2023). Great Salt Lake Playa Element Concentrations under Wet and Dry Conditions near Antelope Island, UT, HydroShare, http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/844ca5f5139643fd96ec94f872b8383d

This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CC-BY

Comments

New Comment

required