Hi, I'm an error. x

Bedrock erosion model comparison


Authors:
Owners:
Resource type: Composite Resource
Storage: The size of this resource is 1.3 MB
Created: Oct 08, 2019 at 5:41 p.m.
Last updated: Oct 08, 2019 at 5:59 p.m.
Citation: See how to cite this resource
Sharing Status: Public
Views: 389
Downloads: 32
+1 Votes: Be the first one to  +1 this.  (You need to be logged in to rate this.)
Comments: No comments (yet)

Abstract

Lab material developed for GY320 at Colorado College. This exercise compares different formulations of bedrock erosion and the effects of each on landscape form, drainage network patterns, and long profiles. The comparison involves Fastscape, a simple stream power erosion model, and a stream power erosion model with sediment. The values of m and n can also be changes to switch from a shear stress to stream power model. A simulated landscape is run for 1 My with diffusion and the tested erosion model and the resulting topography, drainage pattern, and long profile is output. The model is run using the Landlab toolkit (https://landlab.github.io/#/) with the LinearDiffuser, FastScapeEroder, StreamPowerEroder, ErosionDeposition, FlowAccumulator, and DepressionFinderAndRouter components.

Subject Keywords

  • No subject keywords have been added.
  • ${ k }

Duplicate. Keyword not added.

Error: ${ error }
Deleting all keywords will set the resource sharing status to private.

Content

How to Cite

Schanz, S. (2019). Bedrock erosion model comparison, HydroShare, http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/a4a1de12052b44b2ad3dd9db3c66552d

This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.

 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CC-BY

Comments

There are currently no comments

New Comment

required