WEAP and WASH Bear River Systems Models
| Authors: | ${ author.name | nameWithoutCommas } ${ author.organization } ${ author.email } | |
|---|---|---|
| Owners: |
|
|
| Resource type: | Composite Resource | |
| Storage: | The size of this resource is 1.4 MB | |
| Created: | Jan 22, 2019 at 4:18 a.m. | |
| Last updated: | Dec 30, 2020 at 7:25 p.m.
|
|
| DOI: | 10.4211/hs.af71ef99a95e47a89101983f5ec6ad8b | |
| Citation: | See how to cite this resource | |
| Content types: | Single File Content |
| Sharing Status: | Published |
|---|---|
| Views: | 916 |
| Downloads: | 85 |
| +1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
| Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
WEAP and WASH Bear River Systems Models
This resource includes an SQLite file for the Water Management Data Model (WaMDaM) that stores data for two models in the Bear River Watershed in Utah.
The first model is the Watershed Area of Suitable Habitat (WASH) optimization model that allocates water to maximize watershed habitat areas for the Lower Bear River Watershed (Utah portion) (Alafifi and Rosenberg, 2020). The WASH model uses the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) engine which has no user interface.
The second model is a WEAP simulation model that allocates water by water right priority within the Bear River Watershed (Utah and Idaho portions). WEAP has a proprietary database and does not support data publication. Both the WASH and WEAP models were developed from a predecessor 2010 Utah Division of Water Resources model for the lower Bear River basin that had a plain text input file and Fortran computational engine which was depreciated. The WASH model disaggregated irrigation demands within Cache Valley, Utah while the WEAP model extended the model domain upstream to Idaho and Bear Lake.
Subject Keywords
Resource Level Coverage
Spatial
Temporal
| Start Date: | |
|---|---|
| End Date: |
Content
Additional Metadata
| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| People | David E. Rosenberg, David B. Cole et al, Jack Sieber, Jim Stagge, Ayman H. Alafifi, Adel Abdallah |
| Souces | BearRiverFeb2017_V10.9, Genres model for the Lower Bear River, Class Assignment CEE6460, Jim Stagge work, LowerBearRiverFeb2015_V9, WASH-GitHub, OpenAgua/amabdallah@aggiemail.usu.edu |
| Methods | UDWR-GenRes-Manual, Water Evaluation And Planning System, Bear River Model 2017, Bear River Model 2017_cons, Bear River Model 2017_incr, WASH, Online |
| Scenarios | Bear River WEAP Model 2017, Cons25PercCacheUrbWaterUse, Incr25PercCacheUrbWaterUse, Copy, Cons25PercCacheUrbWaterUse_result, Incr25PercCacheUrbWaterUse_result, Bear River WEAP Model 2017_result, Bear River WEAP Model 2012, OneYear, ConsDemand, IncrDemand |
| AttributesCV | Depleted flow, Cost, Priority, Flow, Demand, Elevation, Evaporation, Max_Volume, Min_Volume, Reservoir bathymetry curve, Volume, Watershed Area of Suitable Habitat, Factor |
| ObjectTypesCV | Catchment, Demand site, Diversion, Groundwater, Headflow, Hydroelectric plant, Reservoir, Return flow, Site, Stream, Wastewater treatment plant |
| Organizations | Utah Water Research Lab, Utah Division of Water Resources (UDWR), Stockholm Environment Institute, Utah State University |
| ResourceTypes | Water Evaluation And Planning, Watershed Area of Suitable Habitat (WASH) Systems Model |
| MasterNetworkName | Bear River Network, Lower Bear River Network |
How to Cite
| Abdallah, A. (2020). WEAP and WASH Bear River Systems Models, HydroShare, https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.af71ef99a95e47a89101983f5ec6ad8b |
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment