Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
This resource contains content types with files that need to be updated to match with metadata changes. Show content type files that need updating.
| Authors: |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Owners: |
|
This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (help@cuahsi.org) for information on this resource. |
| Type: | Resource | |
| Storage: | The size of this resource is 1.5 KB | |
| Created: | Feb 08, 2023 at 4:33 p.m. | |
| Last updated: | Feb 08, 2023 at 4:34 p.m. | |
| Citation: | See how to cite this resource |
| Sharing Status: | Public |
|---|---|
| Views: | 260 |
| Downloads: | 189 |
| +1 Votes: | Be the first one to this. |
| Comments: | No comments (yet) |
Abstract
Numerical models have been an integral component in management of the Edwards Aquifer for over four decades. The scale and complexity of the models have varied considerably during this time, with the changes attributed to improvements in both numerical software and the conceptual models on which the models are predicated. Resolution of early models was coarse, which rendered them useful only in large-scale, groundwater-resource assessments. Increased resolution and improved refinement in the conceptualization of the complex hydrostratigraphic framework of the Edwards Aquifer have led to expanded applicability of the ensuing models in terms of accommodating local-scale hydraulic features such as pumping scenarios and changes in recharge/discharge mechanisms (i.e., urbanization and climate change). As part of these improvements and advancements, regional-scale groundwater availability models augmented by local-scale models based upon improved conceptualization provide the ability to: (1) replicate more extreme conditions, such as the drought-of-record; (2) improve boundary conditions by extending models to include natural hydraulic boundaries; and (3) couple groundwater flow models with surface-water flow models so that the entire terrestrial water cycle can be accommodated during water-resource management scenario assessment.
Subject Keywords
Coverage
Spatial
Content
Additional Metadata
| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| DOI | 10.1130/2019.1215(03) |
| Depth | |
| Scale | 1 001 - 10 000 km² |
| Layers | |
| Purpose | Groundwater resources |
| GroMoPo_ID | 357 |
| IsVerified | True |
| Model Code | MODFLOW;Feflow |
| Model Link | https://doi.org/10.1130/2019.1215(03) |
| Model Time | |
| Model Year | 2019 |
| Model Authors | Green, RT; Winterle, J; Fratesi, B |
| Model Country | United States |
| Data Available | Report/paper only |
| Developer Email | NA |
| Dominant Geology | Carbonate (including karst) |
| Developer Country | USA |
| Publication Title | Numerical groundwater models for Edwards Aquifer systems |
| Original Developer | No |
| Additional Information | A summary paper describing a large number of models used to model the Edwards Aquifer in Texas, USA |
| Integration or Coupling | |
| Evaluation or Calibration | |
| Geologic Data Availability | No |
How to Cite
This resource is shared under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment