Please wait for the process to complete.
Checking for non-preferred file/folder path names (may take a long time depending on the number of files/folders) ...
This resource contains some files/folders that have non-preferred characters in their name. Show non-conforming files/folders.
||This resource does not have an owner who is an active HydroShare user. Contact CUAHSI (email@example.com) for information on this resource.|
|Storage:||The size of this resource is 62.1 KB|
|Created:||Nov 16, 2021 at 4:48 a.m.|
|Last updated:|| Dec 01, 2021 at 11:02 p.m.
|Citation:||See how to cite this resource|
|+1 Votes:||Be the first one to this.|
|Comments:||No comments (yet)|
The hydrology, chemistry, and biology of a stream are strongly interconnected, and must all be considered when assessing the overall state of a water body. In this investigation, we seek to answer the following research question:
What are the differences in water quality and quantity between a rural headwater stream and an urban main-stem river?
For our investigation, we measured, analyzed, and compared water quality and quantity characteristics in a rural headwater stream (Las Huertas Creek, abbreviated as LH) and an urban main-stem river (The Rio Grande, abbreviated as RG) located near and in Albuquerque, New Mexico. At each of our two locations, we measured water quality and quantity at a downstream site (abbreviated as D), a midstream site (abbreviated as M), and an upstream site (abbreviated as U) for a total of six sites in our study. We defined these areas as the location abbreviation followed by the site abbreviation; for example, the Las Huertas Downstream site was defined as LH_D while the Rio Grande Upstream site was defined as RG_U.
To answer our research question, we measured hydrologic, chemical, and biological parameters at each of our six sites. For hydrology, we measured discharge and soil hydraulic conductivity; for chemistry, we measured temperature, specific conductivity, conductivity, total dissolved solids, salinity, dissolved oxygen, pH, turbidity, alkalinity, anions, and cations; for biology, we measured chlorophyll a, benthic macroinvertebrates, organic matter, and riparian vegetation. Below is a description of our study locations and our parameter methods followed by parameter results and a discussion.
|Title||Owners||Sharing Status||My Permission|
|UNM WR 573: Field Methods Fall 2021||Wesley Noe · Kambray Townsend · Brennan Davis · Annalise Porter · Christopher Traft · Lindsey Rotche · Natalie Gayoso · Mollie Hanttula · Becky Bixby · Ryan Webb||Published||Open Access|
People or Organizations that contributed technically, materially, financially, or provided general support for the creation of the resource's content but are not considered authors.
|Natalie Gayoso||University of New Mexico||NM, US|
|Kambray Townsend||University of New Mexico||New Mexico, US|
|Lindsey Rotche||University of New Mexico||NM, US|
|Brennan Davis||University of New Mexico||New Mexico (NM), US|
|Ryan Webb||University of New Mexico||New Mexico, US|
|Annalise Porter||University of New Mexico||New Mexico, US|
|Becky Bixby||University of New Mexico||New Mexico, US|
|Christopher Traft||University of New Mexico||NM, US|
|Mollie Hanttula||UNM||New Mexico, US|